Logo

Defender of your Digital Freedom

Home > Digital Privacy > Summary Report: Celebrating the Right to be Let Alone [Sep 02, 2017; New Delhi]
Privacy

Summary Report: Celebrating the Right to be Let Alone [Sep 02, 2017; New Delhi]

Sep 04,2017 | 10:12 am

On Sep 2, 2017, SFLC.in organized a discussion titled “Celebrating the Right To Be Let Alone” to commemorate the recent recognition of right to privacy as a fundamental right, discuss the privacy judgment, its key takeaways, the impact it will have on pending Aadhaar litigations, how it will affect various aspects of policy making and the way forward from here. The speakers for the discussion included Prasanna S. (Advocate), Vickram Crishna (Technologist & Human Rights Activist), Dr. Usha Ramanathan (Legal Researcher), Ritu Srivastava (General Manager, Research and Advocacy, Digital Empowerment Foundation) and Sukarn Singh Maini (Counsel, SFLC.in). Saikat Datta (Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society) moderated the discussion.

The event started with a short introduction of the speakers, followed by a cake-cutting ceremony to celebrate the historic judgment and the recognition of the right of privacy as a fundamental right.

Mr. Prasanna S., who has been actively involved in the privacy and Aadhaar litigations since its inception, elucidated the history of privacy litigations in India, and gave a brief background of the judgments in M.P Sharma and Kharak Singh cases. He further explained the recent privacy judgment in detail. On being asked about the implications of the judgment on Aadhaar, Prasanna highlighted the key parts of the judgment that talked about balancing of compelling state interests with the right to privacy and the principle of proportionality.

Mr. Vickram Crishna, who is also a Board Member of SFLC.in and one of the petitioners’ in the Aadhaar case, was of the opinion that the Unique Identification Authority of India cannot be the custodian of peoples’ private data. He discussed the all-pervasive nature of technology and how it has creeped into all aspects of our lives. However, he disagreed with the point of view that privacy is broken by technology. He emphasized that the lack of privacy due to the advancement of technology should not be used as an excuse, and that we should still find ways to protect and reassert our right to privacy. Mr. Crishna also expressed his anguish with the Government and mentioned that he feels abandoned as a citizen, when he witnesses the Government flouting Supreme Court orders that make Aadhaar a voluntary scheme.

Dr. Usha Ramanathan was of the view that the Aadhaar project is not just about the violation of privacy, but also built to favor corporate interests. She remarked that the project is not helping in the siphoning of money, but in fact, excluding people from obtaining welfare benefits that they otherwise are entitled to. However, she maintained that elevating the right to privacy to the status of fundamental right will make a strong case against Aadhaar. Ms. Ramanathan also talked about the implications of the judgment on right to information. She emphasized that the only solution to countering mass surveillance projects like Aadhaar by the Government is civil disobedience.

Ms. Ritu Srivastava expressed her views on the use of technology for the purpose of governance. She said that there are various other alternatives to Aadhaar that can be employed for identification. Ms. Srivastava was of the opinion that citizens and the Government need to be mutually transparent, but such is not the case with respect to Aadhaar, wherein only citizens are expected to be transparent and there is no information with regard to the security system of Aadhaar and the ownership of data that is collected.

Mr. Sukarn Singh Maini illuminated everyone on the recent committee formed by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) and headed by former Justice B.N Srikrishna, to decide India’s data protection policy and come up with a draft data protection bill. He also highlighted the key points of the consultation paper on data privacy that has been floated by TRAI and is awaiting comments from the public.

The discussion was followed by a brief audience interaction round.

Letter To The Standing Committee on Information Technology

Recommendations to The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information Technology for Surveillance Reforms in lieu of WhatsApp-NSO Revelations Recommendations sent to Dr. ...

Follow-up Comments on the Consultation on Draft Personal Data Protection Bill, 2018

On August 20, 2019 we learned that the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) was conducting a follow-up consultation on ...

Truecaller automatically retrieved bank account details of its users and registered them for UPI

Reports came out on Tuesday that the Truecaller app had sent SMS messages from phones of unsuspecting users to create UPI ...

Roundtable on ‘Policy Enabling – Information Technology in Healthcare’

We are organising an invite-only round table discussion on 'Policy Enabling - Information Technology in Healthcare' in Bangalore on 27 ...

What has been changed in the Aadhaar Amendment Bill?

On Wednesday, 02 January 2019, we got our first look at The Aadhaar and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2018. On ...

The Aadhaar and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2018

  Today, the Central Government introduced, The Aadhaar and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2018 in the Lok Sabha. The Bill ...

Someone still asking for Aadhaar? Let us know!

Contrary to the Supreme Court’s judgment, some entities are still asking for Aadhaar A nine judge bench of the Supreme ...

FAQs on the Aadhaar Judgment

1. Can Aadhaar be required for getting a new mobile connection? Is linking Aadhaar with mobile number mandatory? No. The ...

Key Highlights of the Aadhaar Judgment

The Supreme Court has delivered its much awaited judgment in the Aadhaar case, wherein the majority view, comprised of - ...

Full text of the 1448-page Aadhaar Judgement

The Supreme Court has delivered its much awaited judgment in the Aadhaar case, wherein the majoirty view, comprised of -  ...