Logo

Defender of your Digital Freedom

Home > Digital Privacy > Panel Discussion on Privacy, National Security & India’s need for a Privacy Legislation
Panel Discussion on Privacy Law

Panel Discussion on Privacy, National Security & India’s need for a Privacy Legislation

May 12,2016 | 07:51 am

Panel Discussion on Privacy Law

SFLC.in, along with the Mr. Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Member of Parliament is organizing a panel discussion on ‘The Need For a Dedicated Privacy Legislation In India: Next Steps’ on 12th May 2016 from 4pm to 7pm at Constitution Club of India, New Delhi.

The recent debate on the contentious Aadhaar Act saw the issue of privacy and data protection take centre stage. But inspite of the success of the Digital India initiative, the progress on the privacy front has not kept pace. As the government comes up with initiatives of collecting large volume of citizen data, rolling out internet services to villages and integrating subsidies to biometric data, there is an urgent need for an overarching comprehensive law in India on privacy and data protection. Although, the efforts at drafting a privacy legislation are underway since 2011, a concrete bill has not been laid in front of the Parliament for consideration.

Keeping this in mind, Member of Parliament, Rajeev Chandrasekhar and SFLC.in are organizing a panel discussion on the theme of ‘The Need for a Dedicated Privacy Legislation in India.’ This discussion aims to conduct a stakeholder conversation with academia, civil society, private sector, and government associates, regarding the drafting of India’s privacy law, and the vital components that should be included therein. While learning from the global experiences in privacy regimes, we hope to pursue a nuanced discussion with respect to the extent and limitations of collection, retention and disclosure of personal information of citizens, along with measures that should permit a certain level of indulgence by the State for reasons of national security, prevention of acts of terrorism, and in situation of emergencies.

Considering the heightened global debate surrounding the sharing of personal data with state actors for purposes of national security and protection of state, this discussion will have a special emphasis on the safeguards that should find place in the Indian privacy legislation to balance the concerns of national security with that of a citizen’s privacy.

There are two panels:

1. Balancing the concerns of national security & safeguarding a citizen’s privacy
With the background of implications of initiatives like Aadhaar operating in the absence of privacy legislation, thediscussion will focus on the safegaurds needed for protecting the ciitizen’s privacy rights 2. Taking from global experiences, formulating the essential elements for India’s privacy framework A look into the privacy laws of other countries, and a thorough discussion on the necessary inclusions in India’s privacy legislation.

Letter to Delhi Government Against Mandatory

Letter to Delhi Government Against Mandatory Installation of Aarogya Setu by Licensees of Wholesale Liquor Vends Recently, the Department of ...

Letter to Telangana Government Against Mandatory Aadhaar Data for Non-Agricultural Land Records

Letter to Telangana Government Against Mandatory Aadhaar Data for Non-Agricultural Land Records As Telangana's Dharani Portal goes live today, we wrote ...

Letter to Jawaharlal National University Against Mandatory Installation of Aarogya Setu by Employees and Students

Letter to Jawaharlal National University Against Mandatory Installation of Aarogya Setu by Employees and Students Recently, the Jawaharlal National University ...

Karnataka High Court Orders That State Cannot Deny Services or Benefits To Citizens Who Do Not Have Aarogya Setu

Update on Anivar A Aravind v. Ministry of Home Affairs, GM PIL WP (C) 7483 of 2020 : Karnataka High Court ...

Update on Anivar A Aravind v. Ministry of Home Affairs, GM PIL WP (C) 7483 of 2020

Update on Anivar A Aravind v. Ministry of Home Affairs, GM PIL WP (C) 7483 of 2020 SFLC.in’s advisory board ...

Our Comments on Draft Health Data Management Policy of the National Digital Health Mission

Our Comments on Draft Health Data Management Policy of the National Digital Health Mission The Ministry of Health and Family ...

Our Comments on the Non-Personal Data Governance Framework Report

Our Comments on the Non-Personal Data Governance Framework Report A committee of experts under the Chairpersonship of Mr. Kris Gopalakrishnan ...

RTI Reply by NITI Aayog on Working Document on Responsible AI: #AIForAll

RTI Reply by NITI Aayog on Working Document on Responsible AI: #AIForAll On July 30th, NITI Aayog had released a ...

Government of Rajasthan clarifies to SFLC.IN that Aadhar is not mandatory for COVID-19 testing

Government of Rajasthan clarifies to SFLC.IN that Aadhaar is not mandatory for COVID-19 testing Recently, it was brought to our notice that the Rajasthan ...

SFLC.IN’s Comments on NITI Aayog’s Working Document on Responsible #AIForAll

SFLC.IN's Comments on NITI Aayog's Working Document on Responsible #AIForAll The NITI Aayog released its working document on “Responsible #AIforAll” ...