Logo

Defender of your Digital Freedom

Home > Internet Governance > Our Statement on the Cabinet Approval of the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019
data protection, data locatlisation, sflc, privacy

Our Statement on the Cabinet Approval of the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019

Dec 04,2019 | 01:45 pm

Our Statement on the Cabinet Approval of the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019

Today the Union Cabinet approved the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019. The Government has proposed to introduce the Bill in the ongoing winter session of Parliament.

Our comments to the Justice Srikrishna Committee draft of the Bill can be accessed – here.

Comments submitted to the Justice Srikrishna Committee’s White Paper can be accessed – here.

Our expectations from the revised draft of the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019:

  1. Data Localisation

  • We hope that the Government has removed the mandatory requirement of storing at least one copy of all personal data in India (mirroring requirement);

  • Narrowed the ambit and scope of critical personal data – which can only be stored in India; and

  • Revised the standards for cross-border transfer of personal data to make them less cumbersome.

  1. Government Access to Data and Surveillance Reform

  • We hope that the Government has considered provisions for surveillance reform and provided for sufficient safeguards against State access to personal data (i.e. processing of personal data by the State without the consent of individuals).

  • In the current draft, the Government has been provided over-arching exceptions and exemptions to process personal data without requisite procedural safeguards or judicial oversight.

To read our comprehensive report on India’s surveillance laws, please click – here.

  1. Independence of the Regulator

  • We hope that the Government has made appropriate changes to the regulatory structure proposed in the current version of the Bill i.e. the Data Protection Authority of India (“the DPA”) and the Adjudication Wing, to ensure the independence of these regulatory bodies.

  • In the current draft, the State has disproportionate control over the DPA and the Adjudication Wing, which will hamper effective enforcement of the law, specially when it applies to the Executive.

Transparency

In line with the Government’s Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy, we request the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to release all comments as received by them in the round of public consultation on the earlier draft of the Bill. This will be in line with principles of transparency and will help all stakeholders comprehensively assess the changes proposed in the new version of the Bill.

(Check paragraph 6 of the Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy – here)

We believe that the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, due its complexity and wide import, must be referred to the Standing Committee on Information Technology post its introduction in either House of Parliament. This will also provide sufficient time to stakeholders to give their comments on the latest version of the Bill.

Representation sent to Arunchal Pradesh

A newspaper article dated 30.10.2020 published in Telegraph India titled ‘Arunachal Internet Bar to curb Cheating’ stated that Arunachal Pradesh government will be ...

Letter to Telangana Government Against Mandatory Aadhaar Data for Non-Agricultural Land Records

Letter to Telangana Government Against Mandatory Aadhaar Data for Non-Agricultural Land Records As Telangana's Dharani Portal goes live today, we wrote ...

Letter to the Kerala Government to Reconsider the Proposal for Amending the Kerala Police Act by inserting Section 118 (A)

Letter to Kerala Government to Reconsider the Proposal for Amending the Kerala Police Act by inserting Section 118 (A) SFLC.in sent ...

Event – Creating Safe Spaces Online

SFLC.in in collaboration with Trust Law, Thompson Reuters Foundation is hosting a 2 day event on 'Creating Safe Spaces Online' on 21st-22nd ...

SFLC.in writes to the Criminal Reforms Committee

SFLC.in sent its recommendations to the Criminal Reforms Committee on 16th September 2020. Our recommendations covered criminal sanctions against free speech ...

Update on Anivar A Aravind v. Ministry of Home Affairs, GM PIL WP (C) 7483 of 2020

Update on Anivar A Aravind v. Ministry of Home Affairs, GM PIL WP (C) 7483 of 2020 SFLC.in’s advisory board ...

Our Comments on Draft Health Data Management Policy of the National Digital Health Mission

Our Comments on Draft Health Data Management Policy of the National Digital Health Mission The Ministry of Health and Family ...

Our Comments on the Non-Personal Data Governance Framework Report

Our Comments on the Non-Personal Data Governance Framework Report A committee of experts under the Chairpersonship of Mr. Kris Gopalakrishnan ...

Letter to the Standing Committee on Information Technology on Content Moderation by Social Media Platforms

SFLC.in has written to the Standing Committee on Information Technology chaired by Dr. Shashi Tharoor on the Content Moderation policies ...

Report from the panel discussion on “Reconciling State’s Interest With a Digital Life”

Report from the panel discussion on “Reconciling State’s Interest With a Digital Life” Software Freedom Law Centre (SFLC.in) in collaboration ...