Logo

Defender of your Digital Freedom

Home > Cyber Security > Our Statement on the BECIL Tender – COVID – 19 Patient Tracking Tool

Our Statement on the BECIL Tender – COVID – 19 Patient Tracking Tool

Apr 23,2020 | 12:24 pm

Our Statement on the BECIL Tender – COVID – 19 Patient Tracking Tool

Broadcast Engineering Consultants Limited, a government of India undertaking under the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting had recently released a tender inviting “Expression of Interest (EOI) for Empanelment of Agency for Supply of Healthcare Equipments”. The tender invites EOI for agencies to be empaneled to supply various ‘healthcare items’. To this tender a corrigendum was released adding three more items to be supplied: (1) Hand Held Thermal Imaging System (2) Optical Thermal Fever Sensing System (3) COVID – 19 Patient Tracking Tool.

Reading through the specifications of the tracking tool, it is evident that the item, presumably a comprehensive software, goes beyond a healthcare tool and opens up the possibility of mass surveillance.

The first specification for the equipment brands the equipment as an “Intelligence investigation platform & tactical tool to detect, prevent and investigate threats to national security using CDR, IPDR, Tower, Mobile Phone Forensics Data.”

The use of the phrase “national security” points to the possibility of the Government using this equipment to turn on an ‘always-active’ regime of surveillance in the guise of managing a pandemic.

The specification also mandates that it “should allow user to import data extracted from Mobile Forensic Tools like CellebriteUFED, Micro-Systemation XRY and HANCOM GMD”. It is also provided that the tool should be compatible with the i2 Analyst Notebook for advanced link Analysis. Cellebrite UFED (Universal Forensic Extraction Device), Micro-Systemation XRY and HANCOM GMD are linked to mobile forensics. It is not clear as to why a patient tracking tool should have such forensic capabilities. The use of CDR, tower data, and geo-location also indicates that chances are high that the entire system will be connected with already existing systems such as CMS and NATGRID. The tool with analysis of cell tower dumps and gateway scans and CDR records has the potential to be used as a mass surveillance tool.

SFLC.IN considers this move by the government to use technology to build a system that has the potential to be used for mass surveillance to be dangerous as we do not have sufficient safeguards against mass surveillance. Although the use of technology will be required for contact tracing, this has to be done in conjunction with conventional methods of tracking and the pandemic should not be an excuse to introduce a blanket system of surveillance. Many components of the tool included in the tender document go beyond the common requirements of contact tracing and could result in pervasive surveillance. SFLC.in along with other organisations and individuals had earlier sent a joint letter to the Central Government and various state governments requesting that any technology measures taken during the pandemic phase should respect the privacy of citizens and should be time -limited and in tune with the principles of necessity and proportionality.

Letter to Delhi Government Against Mandatory

Letter to Delhi Government Against Mandatory Installation of Aarogya Setu by Licensees of Wholesale Liquor Vends Recently, the Department of ...

Letter to Telangana Government Against Mandatory Aadhaar Data for Non-Agricultural Land Records

Letter to Telangana Government Against Mandatory Aadhaar Data for Non-Agricultural Land Records As Telangana's Dharani Portal goes live today, we wrote ...

Letter to Jawaharlal National University Against Mandatory Installation of Aarogya Setu by Employees and Students

Letter to Jawaharlal National University Against Mandatory Installation of Aarogya Setu by Employees and Students Recently, the Jawaharlal National University ...

Karnataka High Court Orders That State Cannot Deny Services or Benefits To Citizens Who Do Not Have Aarogya Setu

Update on Anivar A Aravind v. Ministry of Home Affairs, GM PIL WP (C) 7483 of 2020 : Karnataka High Court ...

Update on Anivar A Aravind v. Ministry of Home Affairs, GM PIL WP (C) 7483 of 2020

Update on Anivar A Aravind v. Ministry of Home Affairs, GM PIL WP (C) 7483 of 2020 SFLC.in’s advisory board ...

Our Comments on Draft Health Data Management Policy of the National Digital Health Mission

Our Comments on Draft Health Data Management Policy of the National Digital Health Mission The Ministry of Health and Family ...

Our Comments on the Non-Personal Data Governance Framework Report

Our Comments on the Non-Personal Data Governance Framework Report A committee of experts under the Chairpersonship of Mr. Kris Gopalakrishnan ...

RTI Reply by NITI Aayog on Working Document on Responsible AI: #AIForAll

RTI Reply by NITI Aayog on Working Document on Responsible AI: #AIForAll On July 30th, NITI Aayog had released a ...

Government of Rajasthan clarifies to SFLC.IN that Aadhar is not mandatory for COVID-19 testing

Government of Rajasthan clarifies to SFLC.IN that Aadhaar is not mandatory for COVID-19 testing Recently, it was brought to our notice that the Rajasthan ...

SFLC.IN’s Comments on NITI Aayog’s Working Document on Responsible #AIForAll

SFLC.IN's Comments on NITI Aayog's Working Document on Responsible #AIForAll The NITI Aayog released its working document on “Responsible #AIforAll” ...