Logo

Defender of your Digital Freedom

Home > Freedom of Speech > Our Statement on Liability of WhatsApp group Admins

Our Statement on Liability of WhatsApp group Admins

Apr 15,2020 | 02:02 pm

Our Statement on Liability of WhatsApp group Admins

The advisory issued by the Office of Special Inspector General of Police, Maharashtra Cyber has warned that admins of WhatsApp groups along with users could be punished for objectionable content posted on WhatsApp groups.  The advisory has cited various provisions of IPC including Sections 153 A, 153B, 295A, 505 and 188 of Indian penal Code, Section 54 of the Disaster Management Act, Section 68 of the Bombay Police Act, 951 and Section 144 and Section 144(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.   It has been reported in media that this and other orders by various district authorities have led to many admins changing settings of groups so that only the administrators can post messages in groups.  During the lock-down when people are confined to their homes, messaging platforms like WhatsApp provide a means to stay in touch with their near and dear ones. A WhatsApp group admin has only a limited power to add members to a group or to remove them. He does not have any power to moderate or to censor messages in a group.  While it is important to curb misinformation, imposing illegal restrictions on admins may not be the best way to achieve this. 

It goes against basic principles of criminal law to hold an admin liable for a post published by some one else in the group.  A WhatsApp admin cannot be considered to be an intermediary under the Information Technology Act, 2000 and there cannot be a case of secondary liability against her.  We urge the authorities to ensure that there is no chilling effect on free speech caused while coming up with measures to prevent spread of misinformation.

Representation sent to Arunchal Pradesh

A newspaper article dated 30.10.2020 published in Telegraph India titled ‘Arunachal Internet Bar to curb Cheating’ stated that Arunachal Pradesh government will be ...

Event – Creating Safe Spaces Online

SFLC.in in collaboration with Trust Law, Thompson Reuters Foundation is hosting a 2 day event on 'Creating Safe Spaces Online' on 21st-22nd ...

SFLC.in writes to the Criminal Reforms Committee

SFLC.in sent its recommendations to the Criminal Reforms Committee on 16th September 2020. Our recommendations covered criminal sanctions against free speech ...

Representation sent to Government of Rajasthan to publish orders regarding suspension of Internet services.

SFLC.in wrote to the Home Secretary, Government of Rajasthan as well the District Collectors of Udaipur, Dungarpur, Pratapgarh and Banswara ...

Letter to the Standing Committee on Information Technology on Content Moderation by Social Media Platforms

SFLC.in has written to the Standing Committee on Information Technology chaired by Dr. Shashi Tharoor on the Content Moderation policies ...

Collective statement to urge the Government of Jammu and Kashmir to restore High-Speed internet.

SFLC.IN along with a coalition of non-profit organisations and civil society groups voice their concerns urging the Jammu and Kashmir ...

SFLC.in sent a representation to the IT standing committee

SFLC.in had written to all the members of the IT committee chaired by Dr. Shashi Tharoor on 8th June 2020 highlighting ...

Event – Reconciling State’s interests with a digital life

SFLC.in in collaboration with Live Law is hosting a panel to commemorate an entire year of communication block in The ...

SFLC.in wrote to the IT committee on issue of women saftey in Digital Spaces

SFLC.in wrote to the Standing Committee on Information Technology chaired by Dr. Shashi Tharoor on the issue of women safety ...

Analysis of the recent app blocking

MEITY on 29th June 2020 blocked 59 apps using Section 69A of the Information Technology Act coupled with the Blocking Rules ...