Logo

Defender of your Digital Freedom

Home > Freedom in the Net > Comments on draft Geospatial Information Regulation Bill 2016
OpenStreetMap of India

Comments on draft Geospatial Information Regulation Bill 2016

Jun 07,2016 | 09:14 am

On May 4, 2016, the Ministry of Home Affairs published the draft Geospatial Information Regulation Bill, 2016, seeking to regulate the acquisition, dissemination, publication and distribution of geospatial information of India that is likely to raise security concerns. Comments on the Bill were invited from stakeholders, in pursuance of which we submitted our own set of responses. Here’s the full text of our submission.

Objective of the bill

The stated objective of the Bill is to regulate the acquisition, dissemination, publication and distribution of geospatial information of India, which is likely to affect the security, sovereignty and integrity of India and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. This objective, based on the expansive definition of geospatial data used in the Bill, gives the proposed legislation a wide ambit and could result in misuse as seen in the case of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. If the aim of the legislation is limited to protecting the security interests of the country, the objective and provisions of the legislation need to be tailored to suit that aim, ensuring that the freedoms of citizens, including the freedoms of speech and expression and the freedom to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business, are not affected.The Government should hold wider consultations on the need to have such a bill and the boundaries of it as the bill in the current form imposes wide restrictions on businesses as well as users.

Definition

The definition of “geospatial information” in the Bill is too broad and could cover a wide variety of information including photographs taken by a citizen with a mobile camera having location data. The definition needs to be narrowed down to remote sensing data and satellite imagery so that users are not burdened with licensing requirements.

Acquisition of Data

The bill should only be restricted to the acquisition of remote sensing data and satellite imagery and that too for the limited purpose of the security interests of the country with respect to information pertaining to strategic locations. Any broad licensing requirements on acquisition will only affect the Indian industry as mapping data has wide variety of applications ranging from navigation systems to open source mapping.

Distribution of Data

There should not be any restrictions placed on the distribution and use of geospatial data, except may be with respect to data pertaining to locations of strategic importance. As data pertaining to locations are often crowd-sourced, the map providers and distributors downstream do not have much control over this. In such cases, providers should be granted immunity in tune with provisions of Section 79 of the InformationTechnology Act, 2000.

License

By mandating any person who wants to acquire, disseminate, publish or distribute geospatial data to apply for a license will result in unnecessary bottlenecks for industry,especially startups and for Open source projects like OpenStreetMap. OpenStreetMapproject and other mapping solutions are often used by citizens during emergency situations like natural disasters for relief operations. Thus, licensing requirements will sound the death knell for such initiatives.

Representation sent to Arunchal Pradesh

A newspaper article dated 30.10.2020 published in Telegraph India titled ‘Arunachal Internet Bar to curb Cheating’ stated that Arunachal Pradesh government will be ...

Event – Creating Safe Spaces Online

SFLC.in in collaboration with Trust Law, Thompson Reuters Foundation is hosting a 2 day event on 'Creating Safe Spaces Online' on 21st-22nd ...

Representation sent to Government of Rajasthan to publish orders regarding suspension of Internet services.

SFLC.in wrote to the Home Secretary, Government of Rajasthan as well the District Collectors of Udaipur, Dungarpur, Pratapgarh and Banswara ...

Letter to the Standing Committee on Information Technology on Content Moderation by Social Media Platforms

SFLC.in has written to the Standing Committee on Information Technology chaired by Dr. Shashi Tharoor on the Content Moderation policies ...

Report from the panel discussion on “Reconciling State’s Interest With a Digital Life”

Report from the panel discussion on “Reconciling State’s Interest With a Digital Life” Software Freedom Law Centre (SFLC.in) in collaboration ...

Roundtable on Encryption, September 3rd, 5:00 PM-6:30 PM

Roundtable on Encryption, September 3rd, 5:00 PM-6:30 PM On September 3rd, 2020, Software Freedom Law Centre, India (SFLC.in) organized a ...

Collective statement to urge the Government of Jammu and Kashmir to restore High-Speed internet.

SFLC.IN along with a coalition of non-profit organisations and civil society groups voice their concerns urging the Jammu and Kashmir ...

SFLC.in sent a representation to the IT standing committee

SFLC.in had written to all the members of the IT committee chaired by Dr. Shashi Tharoor on 8th June 2020 highlighting ...

Event – Reconciling State’s interests with a digital life

SFLC.in in collaboration with Live Law is hosting a panel to commemorate an entire year of communication block in The ...

Analysis of the recent app blocking

MEITY on 29th June 2020 blocked 59 apps using Section 69A of the Information Technology Act coupled with the Blocking Rules ...